Author: Sheila Marler

  • The End of the Line for This Regime

    Reading Time: < 1 minute

    I heard today that ICE has caused at least two women to miscarry their babies. Another woman was forced to give birth in detention and two days later her baby was taken away from her. After everything else they have said and done, this is the end of the line for this regime. These people have offended mothers and babies and tainted the entire world. They must go.

    Donald Trump is now enlarging his bunker under the East Wing. He obviously plans to hide in it like a troll and govern us for all eternity. This is not acceptable. We do not deserve to be governed by such people. The world we envision will not humbly bow its head and wait for Trump to give it permission to come forth.

    I declare that the Trump administration and the people who prop it up belong in the trash heap. It is a travesty for them to continue to make their plans like free men and women.

    Every individual who agreed to this regime is responsible for these crimes. First in the dock are members of the political establishment. Then the ignorant voters who supported Trump. Next in line will be the people who marry and celebrate holidays and birthdays while this repugnant administration is lording it over us. Let us instead initiate a period of mourning for the sad plight of the American Republic.

    I say to the poor excuses for human beings in the White House, the Congress, and the Supreme Court, get out! It is painful to see you. It is sickening to hear your voices. Get out!

  • Trump’s Use of Alligators

    Reading Time: 3 minutes

    At last it’s time to write an article about Trump’s use of alligators. This is the article I really wanted to write when I was getting bogged down in the last post. I wrote the article about Wikipedia first because I suspect its editors may be responsible for my difficulties with readership. That fear made me worry that this more important article would not be noticed. Not that I think writing about it will solve the problem of readers, but this worry was on my mind.

    I’ve also been a little worried about presenting this idea here. It has the potential to annoy both the Left and the Right. It could even ruin whatever credibility I have. This concern has put a lot of pressure on me, but these are desperate times and I believe these things are important for me to say.

    The Alligator

    For about fifteen years I’ve known that the alligator is sentient. She can acknowledge and respond to the kindnesses we perform in her behalf, or in behalf of the earth, and she can bestow spiritual gifts. (I’m sure I don’t have to tell you that the alligator herself is as dangerous as ever.)

    I’m saying this now because I believe this knowledge can be a source of hope, and because I believe I have a responsibility to announce her presence.

    Why Now?

    I haven’t given you this information before now because I didn’t understand how it fit in the conversation. Strangely enough, it was after I was told that the alligator’s gift to me is not Christian that I began to understand.

    How is that helpful you ask? When I thought it was a Christian gift it made me very nervous. I didn’t know where it fit in the Christian scheme of things. However, if it’s not Christian it doesn’t imply anything about Christian beliefs.

    Again, how is that helpful? Likewise, the idea that it is not Christian does not worry me because I’m not talking about an ideology or a system of beliefs. I’m talking about something real. The gifts of the earth and her creatures, like the alligator, are as real as the Holy Spirit.

    Am I’m suggesting a new belief system? No, I’m not. I’ve done a little reading about Pantheism and I have learned that humans are natural theologians. They easily spin new systems of beliefs and pit them against other systems of beliefs.That is not what I’m talking about. And it is not necessary.

    How Might This Help With Our Political Chaos?

    I hope this can help us see reality. First, it might help our leaders by assuring them that their drastic, destructive plans are not necessary. And if it guides their behavior, it would help the rest of us. On the other hand, if their necessity stems from their determination to rule, they are currently in peril.

    But the most urgent reason for this message is the realization that this understanding will put America’s cultural peculiarities into perspective. For example, if the well-being of the alligator is primary, what does it say about someone who envisions the alligator as an inanimate token for his cruel detention center in Florida? How sad is that? Trump’s use of alligators represents the worst sort of poverty.

    The Alligator is Ancient

    Trump's Use of Alligators

    The Alligator is ancient. The distinct genus has been here about 37 million years. And it will be here long after the human race destroys itself, God forbid.

    The broader lineage of crocodilians is much older. It’s 80-200 million years old.

    Don’t Forsake the Holy Spirit

    However the reader responds to this message, it is important to maintain ones connection to the Holy Spirit as well. The Holy Spirit found me before I received this understanding of the alligator. I probably would not have discovered one without the other.

    Again, I can’t tell you how you should respond to these things. I can only offer the hope this spirit can serve as an additional source of strength in this strange time.

  • Meltdown

    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    I published an article yesterday that later I realized was not fit to publish. It was a meltdown about Wikipedia. And not a good one. I realized it was a mess last night and deleted it. Then I stayed up all night trying to make sense of it. This is especially annoying because I didn’t consider it an important subject in the first place. It was just something I wanted to get out of the way so I could talk about a more important topic. But I learned something that I want to tell you about.

    In this post I’ll explain what I learned from this mistake and I will try to rewrite it after more careful thought.

    The Lessons

    The first lesson I learned is that I should have discussed my experience at Wikipedia many times on this blog. Instead I politely mentioned it once or twice because I assumed everyone understood what happened to me there.

    I knew I didn’t deserve to be blocked at the time, and so I didn’t feel the need to explain anything. And when I was suddenly confronted by its importance, I experienced the betrayal and injustice like it was yesterday.

    The second lesson that comes to mind involves my impatience while writing this article about my time at Wikipedia. My impatience was based on the belief that it is a trivial subject.

    It is not trivial. It’s important to set the record straight, if for no one else but myself. It also needs to be set straight for anyone who is influenced by editors on Wikipedia. This needs much more thought than I have given it.

    A Meltdown Pandemic?

    A meltdown is what happens when you are treated badly and you have no recourse. There’s no one to complain to and so you just continue on without a resolution. Then one day, 15 years later, everything spills out.

    What really worries me is that I thought that article was fit to publish. I’ve heard there’s a lot of that going around. Some are calling President Trump’s most recent speech a meltdown, not to mention some of his staff’s interviews. It might be a good idea to avoid important interviews and speeches this week. Just a thought.

    Wikipedia’s Editors

    Overall,Wikipedia was a miserable, thankless experience. But the real hell of it was the absence of supporting voices.

    I am aware that worse things are happening to people now. They are made to feel powerless in all kinds of terrible ways, including imprisonment and physical abuse. But no one ranks these evils when they appear. They are all terrible in their own way.

    Wikipedia’s Cowardice

    In my case, it is painful to realize that Wikipedia not only got away with what they did to me, but apparently the editors have continued to argue their case online at my expense. It never occurred to me to check on them. I would have thought they would be too ashamed to continue with this. Now, after it’s too late to dispute their claims, I have to wonder what effect it’s had on my progress here.

    The word ‘cowardice’ is important with respect to Wikipedia. The editors and their allies remain anonymous. This is shocking considering their ability to delete contributions they don’t agree with and even deny access to the authors of those contributions. And the cowardice doesn’t end there. Even if we do discover what they’re doing to our reputation in secret, we don’t have the ability to dispute their statements.

    Nameless, Faceless ‘Scholars’

    My first experience on Wikipedia was the Patriarchy article. Working there was like combat. So, when I experienced something similar with the next article I thought it was normal.

    Many people had been trying to edit the Patriarchy article before me but were held off by a few determined editors. You can see the current version here with contributions from many people. It’s much better than it was.

    The main editor at that time claimed to be a college professor. I sincerely doubted it. I couldn’t imagine that a college professor would say traditional women walk a few steps behind their husband.

    Even so, I thought the article just needed more information. He did not want information and happily deleted everything. I would not have accomplished anything with that article without the help of another editor who stuck up for me. That is the only way you can get anything done there.

    The Dramatic End of My Wikipedia Job

    When that article was complete, I decided to work on the Virgin Birth article. I didn’t start that article. It was already set up, but lacked content. All I planned to do was add information I already had. However, I got pushback right away.

    It wasn’t long before everything I wrote was moved to the Miraculous Births article, without notice. Then the editor who moved it claimed he wrote it. It was all downhill from there.

    Are They Doing Religion or Writing an Encyclopedia?

    I didn’t know it at the time, but I stepped into a landmine. After the fight in the Patriarchy article I thought I knew how to proceed. However, I see now that the Virgin Birth article was not open to negotiation. There seems to be an unspoken agreement that the subject is too delicate for believers. I didn’t put this together until recently. Last week I discovered that the Virgin Birth article still has no content.

    It has also occurred to me that maybe English was not the editor’s first language. Or maybe he’s a religious authority. I couldn’t be expected to know that because the editors use pseudonyms, but it might explain his authoritative manner.

    Since I didn’t have the help of a referee, Miraculous Births continued to be a constant struggle. I would have liked a real discussion about the editor’s objections but that never happened, and I was eventually kicked out of Wikipedia without warning. This took place before 2011.

    I still don’t understand why the material in Miraculous Births is less offensive than it would be in the Virgin Birth article. The majority of the information I added was from Boslooper’s book, The Virgin Birth.

    A Pattern of Discrimination

    I don’t mind if someone disagrees with me. If they will explain the problem I will fix it. But first I need the explanation.

    A disagreement is logical. Its words and phrases actually relate to what the last person said. However, I was not dealing with a disagreement. I don’t even know the name of what he was doing, and no one ever addressed his problematic demands.

    A large part of the problem seems to be that no one is paying attention. My struggle went on for a long time without interference from a helpful editor. It ended with me being blocked permanently.

    Again, no one objected to what was happening, not at that time and not since I left. And in the end, another editor was allowed to make personal use of the Miraculous Births material that got me kicked out.

    Wikipedia wronged me in many ways and used up much of my time in the process. It didn’t seem unintentional to me. It seemed malicious and personal.

  • James 1: 16-17

    This entry is part 12 of 18 in the series The Epistle of James
    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    16. Make no mistake, my beloved brothers (I'm not arguing. I'm telling you):
    17. Every good gift, yes, every perfect gift, is from above, coming down from the Father of lights of heaven, whose nature (unlike those lights) suffers neither the variation of orbit nor any shadow. 
    
    James phrased this truth in a high-toned way. This tone has raised doubts and disputes among commentators. James B. Adamson restates James's meaning like this:

    All human good comes from the perfect Father of the universe.

    Three Ways of Interpreting Verse 17

    In discussing James 1: 16-17, there are three ‘notable’ ways of taking the opening words of verse 17. Adamson prefers that of KJV (King James Version) and RV (Revised Version). In addition, he cites Ropes.

    Ropes translation: Every good gift…is from above, coming down: i.e. taking from above as the predicate, with coming down as an explanatory expansion. 1

    Adamson follows this by comparing the alternative translations to the versions he favors. He argues that if we couple the word ‘is‘ with ‘coming down‘ it would express ‘comes down’ (Syriac version). This translation is less likely in style for this context. The same is true of T. Erskine’s “Every giving is good and every gift is perfect from above” or “from its first source” (see Hort). 2

    Concerning Erskin’s translation, Adamson argues it would be giving ‘from above’ a meaning it ‘cannot bear in this case. Also it would state that all God’s gifts are good, not that all good gifts come from God. A specific sense of meaning is required in both the verse and the context of this discussion. This is: ‘all good gifts come from God‘.

    It seems that James had in mind here some older Greek verses, which Adamson lists in note #106 on page 74. In his opinion, James was as willing as Paul (Acts 17:28) to use a ‘pagan hexameter‘ from an ‘extant hexameter’.

    The Focus in Verse 17 is on the Textual Problems

    Adamson thinks the meaning of the rest of verse 17 is clear enough. However, the words variation and shadow present some difficulties.

    Variation

    The word for variation is used only here in the New Testament. It is also used once or twice in the LXX (Septuagint). In Greek it expresses the setting of the teeth in a saw or stones set alternately. It could also be used for a sequence of beacons or seasons. Adamson prefers variation in the RV to variableness in the KJV for denoting some regularity or system in change.

    It is not necessary to interpret the word in a technical sense. It alludes to the light of the sun and its change from hour to hour and from day to night. Adamson considers this proper to the Greek of the Epistle of James in its reference to the variation of an object in constant orbit. It’s a question of whether the words are in grammatical agreement. He provides the Greek words in the notes.

    The genitive is a genitive of definition, ‘a variation consisting in turning,’ like ‘the city of Athens’ or ‘the gift of sleep. (Adamson p. 75)

    Shadow

    The word shadow is found only here in the New Testament. It is not found in LXX or Philo. There are three possible meanings.

    • The Shadow cast by an object, as in an eclipse (Plutarch ii. 891)
    • The Act of overshadowing
    • A reflected image
    James 1: 16-17

    None of these things can block God’s light. Nothing can interrupt the flow of his goodness, or put us ‘in shadow,’ so that we are out of the reach of his ‘radiance.’ Here Adamson quotes a hymn by Horatius Bonar:

    Light of the world! for ever, ever shining,
    There is no change in Thee;
    True Light of Life, all joy and health enshrining.
    Thou cans't not fade nor flee.
    1. J. H. Ropes, The Epistle of St. James. ICC (1916). ↩︎
    2. F. J. A. Hort, The Epistle of St. James. i. I-iv. 7 (1909). ↩︎
    3. ↩︎

  • Mob Infestation

    Reading Time: 10 minutes

    Sam (Mooney) Giancana’s move to Mexico coincides with the time period of the Blue Ocean strategy1 of American organized crime. Blue Ocean refers to a business strategy. For the Mob, it refers to branching out beyond American shores. It involved not only geographical diversity, but the attainment of higher education by Mob figures. These figures would eventually became CEO’s, attorneys and bankers. Today we can only guess at the degree of mob infestation around the world.

    Organized crime has political goals in addition to its business strategy. It wasn’t understood that organized crime operated like a business until quite recently. Its political aims took longer to be recognized. The Mob pursues many of the same goals as governments. This has been understood for twenty-five years.

    The Testimony of James Woolsey

    In 1999, when James Woolsey was CIA director, he appeared before the Committee on Banking of the United States House of Representatives. He testified that it had become difficult to tell mafias, businesses, and states apart.

    If you should chance to strike up a conversation with an articulate, English-speaking Russian in, say, the restaurant of one of the luxury hotels along Lake Geneva, and he is wearing a $3,000 suit and a pair of Gucci loafers, and he tells you that he is an executive of a Russian Trading company and wants to talk to you about a joint venture, then there are four possibilities. He may be what he says he is. He may be a Russian intelligence officer working under commercial cover. He may be part of a Russian organized crime group. But the really interesting possibility is that he may be all three–and that none of those three institutions have any problem with the arrangement. 2

    Mob Infestation is a Global Phenomenon

    This is not unique to the United States. Boris Yeltsin admitted in 1993 that the Soviet Union had become a ‘mafiya’ power on a world scale. Over the next decade several former Soviet regimes evolved into mafia states. Under such regimes, organized crime groups work as a complement to state structures. Their purpose is to do everything the government can’t legally do as a government. This includes trafficking arms, carrying out domestic assassinations, extortion, money-laundering, drug trafficking and controlling offshore investments in strategic industries.

    By 2012 analysts were warning of the convergence of criminal, political and business power in Latin America Africa and Asia. The warnings were issued by analysts such as Moises Naim, Misha Glenny, Douglas Farah and John T. Picarelli.

    Signs of a Worldwide Convergence of Organized Crime

    Signs of a worldwide convergence of organized criminal activity have been identified in North Korea and the Middle East. Armed groups are found in Afghanistan, Colombia, Mali and Myanmar. These groups traffic drugs, sometimes with the help or participation of state actors.

    The traffic in minerals and wildlife fuels conflict in Africa, and organized piracy has emerged as a central factor in Somalia’s political economy. It goes without saying that it aggravates Somalia’s politics and civil war.

    In the Sahel and North Africa, terrorist and militia fortunes have been tied to organized hostage markets as well as drug, oil and cigarette smuggling.

    In the Balkans, there is cigarette smuggling, organ trafficking, human trafficking and a trade in stolen cars. All of these activities factor into the region’s bloody past and post-war politics.

    The Death Toll Rivals War Deaths

    Homicide rates in Central America are higher than Afghanistan, Syria and South Sudan. The high death rate is the result of struggles by locals to control drug, human trafficking and extortion markets.

    The Blue Ocean Strategy

    It’s important to mention that government collusion with organized crime is not the fault of a single administration. We have talked about the Kennedy Administration’s dealings with the Mob, but JFK and his brother, Bobby Kennedy, inherited the problem. However, the Blue Ocean strategy began after the Bay of Pigs operation failed to oust Castro.

    Of course the Mob kept this strategy to itself. Previously, the Mob had been counting on its American partners to help recover its investments in Cuba. With the Blue Ocean strategy, this became less important.

    Making Sense of the Collaboration

    When the Castro government came to power, it hurt the interests of the Havana Mob, the American Mob and the US government. So, these three entities cooperated in the attempt to remove him. But there were complications.

    The Mob had more autonomy in international affairs that anyone realized at the time. However in spite of this relative freedom to maneuver, its manipulations may have contributed to the failure of the Bay of Pigs.

    Before Kennedy was elected, the Mob was a participant in the larger Cold War. So, the Kennedy’s continued to believe it would assist in removing Castro after the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Unfortunately, the Mob had lost interest in Cuba by 1961 or 1962. It did not keep its partners informed of this fact.

    The Kennedy Administration

    US relations with Cuba had already soured when Kennedy became president. Cuba had turned to Soviet protection in the mid-50s as a result of Eisenhower’s coercive policies. Then, in February 1960, Cuba signed a five-year trade and investment deal with the Soviet Union. In response the US pressured Esso, Texaco and Anglo-Dutch Shell not to refine Soviet Oil. The government also blocked sales of Cuban sugar to the US. It wasn’t long before Cuba began accepting arms shipments from the USSR. 

    On July 9, Khrushchev threatened to provide military support to Cuba in the event of an invasion. In September Castro moved against US commercial interests in Cuba by nationalizing $1 billion worth of industries.

    In October 1960, Eisenhower imposed an embargo on US trade with Cuba for anything other than food and medicine.  This embargo lasted more than 50 years. This history is covered in detail in Cockayne’s book, cited below.

    What Went Wrong at the Bay of Pigs?

    JFK was concerned about Soviet escalation from the beginning of his presidency. As a result, he was less hawkish on Cuba than the previous administration. This was another factor in the failure of the Bay of Pigs. An additional factor was the plot between the CIA and Mob to assassinate Castro. Although the two efforts were separate, some of the participants assumed the assassination was one part of the effort to overthrow the regime.

    The two plans had actually been combined at one time, but as subsequent plans developed the connection was lost. The aim of the invasion changed. It was now supposed to create a political shock inside Cuba. This would trigger an uprising or a failure of the Cuban military.

    Both the CIA and the Mob failed to inform the US administration of their collaboration. The partners had originally planned to assassinate Castro before the operation began, but as planning progressed the Mob dropped this plan. Unfortunately, Richard M. Bissell, CIA agency officer, continued to believe Castro would be dead before the Brigade hit the beach.This may explain why the CIA did not inform the President that landing exiles at the Bay of Pigs would not hurt Castro’s popularity. Bissell still depended on the assassination.

    The Kennedys Chose the Wrong Friends

    Both the Kennedys and Eisenhower were more involved in plotting the overthrow of Castro than they admitted. Plausible deniability was an important reason for covert action for all of these actors, the administration, the CIA, and the Mob.

    The Kennedys’ may have been more culpable however. They knew exactly how the Mob worked, but they continued to work with them. Removing Castro was the bigger priority.

    The administration’s plans switched to covert methods after the Bay of Pigs, which made the Mob’s methods seem even more important. What the Kennedy administration didn’t understand was that the Mob-CIA partnership was the main problem. Because JFK did not understand this, he refused Castro’s offer to negotiate. He chose to continue working with the Mob.

    What Bobby Kennedy Knew

    Bobby Kennedy knew Operation Mongoose involved working with Cuban gangsters. (Operation Mongoose was a covert operation to cause a popular uprising in Cuba as a pretext for US intervention.) He also knew that the lead military planner, Lansdale, had previously cooperated with criminal groups in Vietnam.  Last but not least, he knew the CIA was working with Sam Giancana. Bobby didn’t object to any of this. However, he did order the FBI to watch Giancana. As a result he learned that Giancana was sharing a mistress with JFK. 

    What Bobby Kennedy Did Not Know

    As it happened, the CIA omitted choice bits of information from their briefings with the Kennedys, just as the Mob withheld information from the CIA. They all had incentives to do so. For example, aside from plausible deniability, the Mob had a domestic incentive to string the CIA along. The CIA provided protection against prosecution.

    As Cockayne put it, they were all practicing the mafia’s omertá. They were conducting themselves by the internalized code of the covert operator’s governmentality. The end result of all these factors was inoperability. (Cockayne, p. 243).

    The Situation From Castro’s Point of View

    As complicated as things were for these participants it was even less clear to Castro, especially since he was not able to distinguish between plots of the CIA, the US government and the Mob. There was a good reason for his confusion. The goals and methods of these actors did not really differ from each other. Castro began to call American diplomats and officials ‘gangsters’. In retrospect it seems inevitable that he would allow the USSR to put nuclear warheads in Cuba.

    One effect of Soviet intervention was that it made killing Castro irrelevant to the US Government. Castro’s death would not solve the strategic threat posed by the Soviets. Kennedy formally suspended sabotage or militant operations during negotiations with the Soviets. But after an agreement was reached, Castro remained concerned that the US would continue covert attacks.

    The US Government Limited its Covert Actions But its Partners Did Not

    At this point, Kennedy shut down support of Cuban exiles from within the US as well as cooperation with the Mob. However, killing Castro remained relevant to the CIA. Agents promptly sent commando teams to Cuba by submarine without clearing it with the President. 

    And of course, the Mob was determined to reestablish its gambling colony in Cuba. American mafiosi worked with Cuban exiles to create another government in exile. They planned to install it through force. The CIA-Mob collaboration raised the possibility that Castro would view Mob freelancing as US strategy. Suddenly the Mob was a wildcard in geopolitics.

    The US Finally loses faith in its Mob Partners

    The US distanced itself but did not try to prevent the Mob’s activities. It did however break up a planned air raid on Cuba by Santo Trafficante Jr. The US government was beginning to understand that criminal groups could be self-serving and unpredictable. Military forces would clearly be more effective, especially when the objective was to send a political message.

    All along there had been warnings to the US Government about the costs of collaboration with the Mob. In January 1961, a US assistant secretary of defense warned the Eisenhower administration what might happen in Latin America if the Castro assassination plans became known. J. Edgar Hoover warned Bobby Kennedy of political blowback caused by the CIA’s collaboration with the Mob. William Harvey warned his CIA superiors of the possibility of the mafia blackmailing the CIA. However, no one considered the possibility that the ‘monster’ would turn on its former master.

    The Mob’s ‘Frustration’

    When he became Attorney General, Bobby Kennedy continued his attempts to shut the Mob down. He was establishing the existence, structure and activities of the mafia Commission, and its record of political activism. This threatened to disrupt the Mob’s connections with the political establishment and it caused Mob leaders much frustration.

    When JFK was assassinated, there were immediate suspicions about the Mob. Both Bobby Kennedy and LBJ voiced these suspicions in private, but they could never be proven. There was even talk that Castro may have collaborated with the Mob. This possibility had been a major concern of the Navy at the beginning of the Underworld Project. If the US could collaborate with the Mob, what would stop other countries from doing the same?

    Blue Ocean and The Birth of Offshore Capitalism

    The Mob apparently had a centrally directed strategy. In the Mob’s case, the Blue Ocean plan involved criminal relocation and strategic learning. The ambition was far-reaching. It sought to shape political developments amidst the changing geography of power. 

    There had been signs in 1958 and earlier that Batista was losing his grip on power. As a result, Lansky had begun to consider other locations where they could duplicate the Havana joint venture. This eventually led to the birth of offshore capitalism in the Bahamas.

    Haiti had been the first target, but it didn’t work out. The Bahamas on the other hand were ruled by a small, white establishment clique, the Bay Street Boys. They did not mind breaking international law.

    Globalization, Deregulation and Money Laundering

    Under globalization, state power does not depend so much on territory. It depends on deregulation to attract transnational capital. Under such a regime, state leaders can use arbitrage by legalizing or licensing goods that are illegal nearby. For example, using casinos and financial institutions as money laundering services.  

    The Nature of State Power

    State power is like mafia power. In Cuba, a CIA-Mob collaboration operated between organized crime’s coercion and state covert operations. In the Caribbean and Atlantic City it operated between the strategic logic of organized crime and economic statecraft.

    The Weakness of Global Financial Regulations is the State’s Downfall

    For the state, international power depends on controlling sovereignty and governmental institutions to broker between international capital flows and local jurisdictions.  However, the weakness of global financial regulations means there are few checks on shady deals. 

    In subsequent decades offshore tax and banking havens proliferated. This was due to the Mob’s strategic vision. It was important to them to create venues for private accumulation of capital without losing capital to public governmental purposes. In the presence of a functioning state, private accumulation would be limited through redistribution, social welfare, or provision of public goods.

    The Bahamas became an ‘exemplar’ of the offshore plaza.

    The strategic logic of organized crime and the economic logic of states seemed to be converging.  The stage was set for the merger of criminal groups’ political strategies with states’ economic strategies. [This Merger] was hinted at by the term ‘mafia states’. ( Cockayne, p. 262)

    Ideally, Capital in a Democracy is Public. In the Underworld, Capital is Private.

    Contrary to the ideal use of capital in a democracy, capital in the underworld economy is always private. Criminals deny that it has any relationship at all with the public order. It follows that any rules and regulations that would restrain capital accumulation or allocate it to those less fortunate is firmly resisted (criminologist Alan Block, cited by James Cockayne).

    The Blue Ocean Strategy and Atlantic City

    Atlantic City was one of several places where rules were relaxed. It was developed to bring weekenders from Philadelphia’s steel mills and New York’s tenements by railway to New Jersey seaside amusements. Grand Bahama on the other hand, involved bringing the middle class and professional criminal class in by airliner. And then there was Las Vegas.

    Resorts International

    Legalizing gambling in Atlantic City was finally accomplished by a constitutional amendment. But not without a struggle. The 1976 referendum campaign was bankrolled by a Bahamian company, Resorts International. This was the old Mary Carter Paint Co. which partnered with the Mob in Bahama.

    Resorts lobbied for political influence to get the license approved and contributed to political campaigns. When this didn’t work, they switched to coercion.  For example, a private security subsidiary of Intertel with connections to U.S. law enforcement, sent politicos to jail.  However, civil servants uncovered Resorts’s link to organized crime and recommended against it. In response, Resorts bought blocks of advertising. This made Governor Byrne comfortable with approving it.  The new Resorts Casino opened May 28, 1978.

    Donald Trump and Resorts Internatinal

    (The following is not included in Cockayne’s book.) Donald Trump bought a controlling interest in Resorts International Inc. in 1987. There was another bidder, but the family of the late Resorts Chairman James M. Crosby, believed Trump was more able to complete the massive Taj Mahal casino project. (Crosby held the controlling interest in the company.)

    The company was later sold, and Trump became the owner of the Taj Mahal casino. The casino was also sold later. Other properties that previously used the “Trump” name, are no longer affiliated with him. One example is the former Trump International Hotel & Tower in Vancouver.


    Donald Trump’s Ballroom in the White House

    To conclude we have to go back to the Mob’s development on Grand Bahama. DevCo’s new resort, the Lucayan Beach Hotel, had a mysterious, giant 9,000-square-foot handball court at the center of its plans. It was eventually revealed to be a gambling floor.

    1. James Cockayne, Hidden Power: The strategic logic of organized crime, C. Hurst and Co. Publishers ltd, Sept. 2026. ↩︎

  • Fake News Story in Britain

    Reading Time: < 1 minute

    I have deleted the post I published yesterday. It may have been accurate, but subsequent information made me think the best thing would be to delete it. The main problem was not the subject of my post, it was what appears to be a fake news story in Britain. I had included links to that story in my article to correct one aspect of my main source, but then the second story fell apart.

    I’m talking about a video on my YouTube feed claiming that Prince William and King Charles had rebuked Keir Starmer. As the day wore on, I wanted to learn more about the dispute. But instead of more details, I found a complete absence of corroboration on channels that would be sure to report such a thing. Finally, I found the opposite of corroboration. I found a story that called the whole dispute a fabrication.

    If it was a fabrication, it was a thorough one. There were even reports that the British markets were collapsing due to fears of a constitutional crisis–also that the British Reform Party was rising in popularity. Last but not least there was a quote from Barack Obama voicing support for the King.

    It may have been an attack on Keir Starmer.

  • James 1:15

    This entry is part 11 of 18 in the series The Epistle of James
    Reading Time: 2 minutes
    James 1:15

    Then his lust having conceived gives birth to sin: and when sin is full grown it brings forth death.

    James 1:15 reminds Adamson of Thomas à Kempis’s analysis of temptation (the phrase, à Kempis, indicates his home town of Kempen, Germany. His name is Thomas Hemerken ). Adamson believes James 1:15 and the other verses in this section inspired Hemerken’s analysis.

    At first it is a mere thought confronting the mind; then imagination paints it in stronger colours; only after that do we take pleasure in it, and the will makes a false move, and we give our assent..1 (Note 101a, p. 72)

    Adamson Demonstrates the Theology and Psychology of the Process

    • Stage One: I see something in a shop. I say to myself: “I should love to have that–but I can’t afford it.” That is the first stage. I am feeling the pull and lure of the bait, but I have suffered no more harm as yet.
    • Stage Two: “I know! I will steal it!” That is, lust, impregnated by the devil, “conceives” the notion and “gives birth’ to the act of theft. Adamson says we should not read too much into the twin image of conception and birth. The grammar behind “having conceived gives birth” is similar to the Hebrew construction rendered “she conceived and bore” (Genesis 4:1, etc.), the participle and finite verb in this instance bringing “thought and act together as a single stage between the temptations on the one hand and death on the other”(Hort)2. “Lust” produces “sin.” James expresses this single idea by the metaphorical parallel of motherhood, signified by the two chief steps–the first and the last–of that single process. “Conceives and bears” are not two separate points.
    • Stage 3: That sin , unless (however late, like the penitent thief) I properly repent before my physical death, will, “being fully grown,” cause my damnation and my spiritual “death” at the Day of Judgment. This agrees with Ropes and supplements him. The “consummation” and the death are in the “next world,” not in our earthly existence.

    The Analogy of a Human Infant Growing to Full Manhood

    James is picturing the growth of sin from birth onward in the analogy of a human infant growing to full manhood. In other words, in the context of a human conception, birth, and growth to maturity.

    “Sin, when full grown, when it becomes a fixed habit…brings forth death.”

    The immediate cause of death is sin, and sin, when full-grown, is in its very nature self-destructive, containing seeds of death in its womb and nurturing its unborn chid until the time of delivery. (Adamson,pp. 73-74)

    1. The Imitation of Christ, tr. Ronald A. Knox and Michael Oakley [1959], p. 32. ↩︎
    2. F. J. A. Hort, The Epistle of St. James, i.1-iv.7 (1909). ↩︎
  • Smoke and Mirrors

    Reading Time: 3 minutes

    Our political situation looks bad, but there is literally nothing of substance behind it. It’s all smoke and mirrors. Whenever the establishment gets in a bind it creates distractions. Well, currently its behavior is the official version of stomping its feet, roaring, and waving its arms around. It’s really quite astonishing to see grown men and women behaving this way. You should all be ashamed of yourselves.

    NAFTA: The Establishment’s Folly

    I have been increasingly astonished at your behavior since 2015. I’m speaking to both parties here. I was amazed, when Hillary called progressives ‘children’ during the 2016 Democratic primary. She and Bill had slit the throat of our Democracy when they were in the White House by signing NAFTA into law among other things. But Hillary blithely expected working class people to vote for her from the depths of a poverty that she helped create. And yet we are children?

    I assume you think we are children because we don’t kowtow to the bosses in the CFR like you do; because we don’t blindly follow the rules of wealthy know-it-alls, like you do. The gall of prancing around on stage like some kind of savior when the voters were cheering for another candidate!

    Ignoring the Signs

    Of course he Republicans were right behind you. They thought they were being all covert, but they were uncovered just the same. There were a few miraculous signs during the 2020 campaign. I didn’t foresee them and I certainly didn’t cause them to happen, but I did appreciate what they revealed. For example, I didn’t know the Mormons were behind the craziness until the earthquake in Utah knocked the trumpet out of the Angel Maroni’s mouth.

    You do love to make mischief in secret and then present a sympathetic face to the voters, don’t you. The earthquake didn’t hurt anyone but how annoyed you were just to be outed. That’s not how you people operate is it? You believe if you can cause fear and pain and death it demonstrates your power.

    Your Crowning Achievement: The Earth’s Destruction

    But the height of my amazement is caused by your plan for our common home, Mother Earth. What great senseless oafs you must be! What resounding bozos! You can’t be serious!

    You have acted as if our suggestions were nothing more than political challenges from your inferiors and therefore meant to be defeated by you, yourselves, with all your clever plans and tricks and money, none of which you created on your own. Our suggestions were not frivolous. They were based on something you know nothing about, common sense. And you call yourselves ‘good’! You give goodness a bad name.

    Your Lack of Belief

    You have taken all your resources from people who believe in you, and from a planet that is defenseless against you. The most glaring flaw in your plan is your failure to recognize real power; a power that heals and comforts and watches over us. This power doesn’t belong to you. It wasn’t invented by your ideologies, and it doesn’t point to your being supreme. You would do well to recognize this important flaw because it demonstrates the lie of your leadership. You are not convincing anyone. We see you.

    Your Tech Lords are Some Kind of Joke

    And then there’s the comical performance of your tech-lords who honestly believe their ideas are the answer to any questions worth asking. Their ideas are cosmic pratfalls. They are not proposals for life. They are proposals for metal and plastic and shiny reflective surfaces–things that can’t speak or breath or talk or think. And yet they use the resources needed for life. These are the fantasies of children who persistently block out the warnings and pleadings of anyone who ever cared for them.

    Come Down From That High Place Where You Don’t Belong

    You are all hot air. There is nothing real or substantial to you. Come down from that high place before you hurt yourselves.

  • James 1:14

    This entry is part 10 of 18 in the series The Epistle of James
    Reading Time: 3 minutes
    James 1:14
    But each man is tried by assault of evil by his own lust, as he feels the pull of its distraction and the enticement of its bait.

    Possible Meanings of the Word ‘Desire‘ in the New Testament

    This section is basically a discussion of the meaning of the word desire in the New Testament. Desire is not necessarily evil. James B. Adamson illustrates this point by citing Luke 22:15. He explains that is why the adjective, evil, must be added in Colossians 3:5. He also quotes John Baillie:

    Animal desire is not in itself evil, it only becomes evil when, in man, it seeks the aid of spirituality–of freedom and reason and the judgment of value–in order to convert its relativity into an absolute and its finitude into infinity.1

    The fifteenth-century poem The Cuckoo and the Nightingale illustrates the neutral use of the English word lust:

    Worship, ease, and all hertes lust.2

    James’s Use of the Terms ‘desire in 1:14 and “you desire‘ in 4:2

    However that is not the meaning James intends by ‘desire‘ or ‘you desire’. From the context he means sin. Adamson tells us that the themes of 1:9-21 are renewed in 4:1-12. The most important need here is to relate 4:5 (and 6) to 1:14.

    James 4:5  
    Or do you suppose it is an idle saying in the scriptures that the spirit that has taken its dwelling in us is prone to envious lust?

    James 1:14
    But each man is tried by assault of evil by his own lust, as he feels the pull of it detraction and the enticement of its bait.

    The words ‘his own‘ (lust) in 1:14 have the opposite meaning of ‘the spirit which God implanted in man’ in 4:5. His own lust implies his own desire, not God’s instigation. A man’s own desire often substitutes some private and individual end for the will of God.’3

    On the other hand, it would be extreme to think that desire for a good dinner must be evil. And although ‘desire’ is personified in James 1:15, Adamson says that is only literary.

    The Influence Toward Evil

    When evil does come, it comes from the appetite of man’s body. It’s part of ‘the world of iniquity’ mentioned in James 3:6. Since the Fall, some evil is inherent.

    There is No Reference to Satan as the Tempter

    There is no reference to Satan as the Tempter in James 1:14. Adamson contrasts 1 Enoch 49:4.; The Clementine Homilies 3:55. For James to refer to Satan would have been substituting one excuse for another.

    James Uses A Fishing Metaphor

    James’s metaphors of the ‘pull of its distraction and the enticement of its bait’ are probably based on his fishing experience in Galilee…but he was assuredly not the first to use a fishing metaphor. The rabbis wrote: ‘As man throws out a net whereby he catches the fish of the sea, so the sins of man become the means of entangling and catching the sinner.’

    The word ‘hooked‘ is also a description of a drug addict. “Each man experiences assault of evil by his own lust, as he feels himself being pulled astray by it and enticed by it as by a bait.” (Adamson p. 71)

    The next paragraph, pages 71-72, analyzes the choice of participles in the translation from the Greek words. It’s quite detailed, and will not be helpful to most readers, so I haven’t included it. However, the last paragraph deals with the theological implications of James 1:14.

    The Theological Implications

    Adamson argues that there is enough of a basis for the theological implications of James 1:14 in the Old Testament and in Judaism that it is not necessary to ‘resort to Qumran’.

    We think James’s view of the flesh as inherently but not entirely evil agrees with that of Paul: “it is better to marry than to burn” (1 Corinthians 7:9); tempts” here introduces a sentence about lust which the mind in the case to be contemplated happens to have a duty to disobey..

    If I’m not mistaken, Adamson’s closing remark refers only to this last paragraph of the commentary. He says, “Only the apparent attempts by some theologians to dissociate lust and the body from Satan made some of our remarks necessary.”

    1. Invitation to Pilgrimage (1944), p. 56. Cf. Menninger, op. cit., pp. 138ff (as cited by Adamson). ↩︎
    2. Similarly in the papyri; see MM. p. 239 (I think he’s referring to the previous note 86, the Greek word for lust). ↩︎
    3. F. J. A. Hort, The Epistle of St. James, i. 1-iv. 7 (1909) p. 24. ↩︎
  • Neo-Gnostic Myth in American Politics

    Reading Time: 5 minutes

    I may have found the book behind the 2016 attack on progressivism. It’s Guido Giacomo Preparata’s The Ideology of Tyranny: The Use of Neo-Gnostic Myth in American Politics. 1 It explains the outrageous backlash that brought us Donald Trump as well as the behavior of the Democrats. But there are a few gaps in the narrative.

    The Unspoken Fear of the American Establishment

    It doesn’t explain the timing of Donald Trump’s attack on the ‘Democrat’ Party or his lack of attention on the progressive movement.

    You will recall that it was the Democrats who fought Sanders most ferociously in the 2015-16 Democratic primary. The Party was not facing much criticism before that. In retrospect, this was probably due to the fact that Donald Trump was not a serious contender for power until after the rise of Bernie Sanders.

    During the general election he never focused on the progressive movement. He merely pranced around acting like Bernie while pretending not to notice him.

    The strangeness continues today. The Democrats don’t mention progressives except to burn them in effigy whenever they see fit. And all the while, Trump’s ire is focused solidly on the Democrats.

    Preparata’s Attack is Really Aimed at Liberalism

    Preparata’s description of the Democratic Party is accurate from a progressive point of view. However, it’s revealing that his views seem to have become a textbook for the radical right. You would think the Right would want to keep the Democratic establishment in place. One of the Party’s goals after all, according to Preparata, was to squash resistance to the Right while giving lip service to the poor and working class. But of course Donald Trump’s Right is another matter. It seems Preparata’s (and Trump’s) attack is really aimed at Liberalism.

    Preparata’s Trigger Words

    All of the trigger words that send the opposition into a rage are in this book: diversity, political correctness, feminism, academia. These words have become bogeymen in their own right, perhaps because Preparata traces them to occult beliefs. And while he insists that both parties are to blame, his focus gradually becomes clear. Liberalism in general is not worth saving. And the majority of the blame for this state of affairs goes to the Democratic Party.

    Why Do They Ignore Progressives?

    When I think of the hopeful days after we first discovered Bernie Sanders and Pope Francis I could cry. We represented the one new and living thing that happened in my lifetime and the establishment squashed it without batting an eye. And make no mistake, the progressive movement was the target of both parties.

    What Exactly are we Fighting?

    Much of the establishment’s behavior during those years fits Preparata’s scenario. Both parties colluded to keep Bernie out of the White House. His description of the Democrats is also accurate. They seem comically incapable of mounting a resistance to Trump. But what exactly are we fighting?

    If everything Preparata says is correct, there is no happy ending to the process Donald Trump has initiated. His reign has no redeeming qualities.

    The Curious Case of the Epstein Files

    The MAGA Movement clearly believes pedophiles operate within the Democratic Party. Preparata’s book might be the source of this belief. However, the Trump Administration’s refusal to release the Epstein files does not fit Preparata’s scenario. What can explain this?

    The ‘Democrat’ Party’s Genealogy According to Preparata

    Preparata traces the Democratic Party’s inability to resist authoritarians to Michel Faucault. And Faucault’s inspiration was Georges Bataille. For his part, Bataille was fascinated by violent pre-Christian orgiastic cults and wanted to infiltrate the collective mind of bourgeois society in order to confuse and redirect it.

    The final objective being that of disabusing the potential convert by reconciling him or her to the spontaneous brutality of life and nature. Finally, Bataille’s social dream was to see men, after they have undergone this kind of initiation, create communities that would celebrate the mystery of collective life much in the fashion of the ancient orgiastic cults, which fascinated him so deeply. (Preparata, p. 9)

    From Bataille to Foucault: the Politics of Diversity

    This project never took off in Bataille’s time, but it is influential today. Preparata argues that Foucault later became part of this movement and made it more respectable. Among other things, his efforts led to a division of the population into identities that were never meant to be reconciled.

    Thus, with uncommon disingenuousness, feminism, homo-sexuality, and nonwhite ethnicity have been granted by the white establishment peer status in the grand arena of public discourse–through, for example, proclamations, exclusive legislation such as Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, and ad hoc academic departments. (Preparata p. 10)

    I assume this argument is the inspiration behind MAGA’s rhetoric. But if we follow Preparata’s logic, it’s strange how useful the concept has been to Trump. It’s like a script for Trump’s authoritarianism, which Preparata claims to reject.

    Michel Foucault

    According to Preparata, the politics of diversity is an academic treatment of Foucault’s Power/Knowledge. Power/Knowledge is a re-elaboration of a creed invented by Bataille in the prewar era. This relationship of ideas gives Preparata leeway to focus solely on Bataille’s vision. In fact, he carries on as if Foucault is Bataille.

    Taking Preparata’s Word For It

    Perhaps the two men really are interchangeable. Most of us are not familiar enough with either one of them to say for sure. But it’s important to keep in mind that we are now talking about Bataille and not Faucault. And it’s not quite that simple. We are also talking about Bataille’s interpretation of James George Frazer’s The Golden Bough, all of which, we mustn’t forget, has been kept alive in the ideas of Faucault.

    We will have to take Preparata’s word that these connections are real and that they support the picture he is presenting. In the process, we should take advantage of any clues he provides. For example, Preparata uses the word ‘polarities’. This concept is important to the radical right-wing.

    Polarities

    According to Preparata, sacredness, like Kali, might have two faces (or polarities)–a clean countenance and a foul underside. The two faces are divided by the barrier of the taboo, which is periodically broken during the saturnalia. Taboo was also broken in cyclical wars.

    “Sacred filth” is, say, menstrual blood, which has filled men with dread for a long time and given rise as a result to a variety of prohibitions (taboos) affecting pubescent females. (Preparata p. 17)

    Was Epstein the Head of a New Religion?

    Frazer claimed that modern civilizations have not given up these rites because they satisfy their archaic craving for scapegoating and solemn murder by executing criminals…

    Apparently holiness, magical virtue, taboo, or whatever we may call that mysterious quality which is supposed to pervade sacred or tabooed persons, is conceived by the primitive philosopher as a physical substance or fluid, with which the sacred man is charged just as Leyden jar is charged with electricity: and exactly as the electricity in the jar can be discharged by contact with a good conductor, so the holiness or magical virtue in a man can be discharged and drained away by contact with the earth, which on this theory serves as an excellent conductor for the magical fluid.2

    From this, Bataille derived imagery that would become a type of theology–“a theology contemplating the clustering of a congregation around a sacred core by means of a peculiar bonding energy.” 3

    Foucault used this conception in his work, Power/Knowledge.

    1. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2007. ↩︎
    2. See Berube, Radical Reformers, p. 24.) ↩︎
    3. Kepel, A l’ouest d’Allah, p. 76. ↩︎
error: Content is protected !!