Category: U.S. Politics

  • Calling the Election Like it is

    Bernie Sanders’ enemies have been trying to take the shine off of his invitation to speak at the Vatican. They claim they’re concerned about protocol but they’re only angry because they think it might increase his chances in this election. They are out of touch with our times.

    To put things in perspective, Senator Sanders has become part of a conversation that was in progress before most of us were born. This is a conversation that will continue regardless of who wins this election. Sanders is naturally a part of it because of the policy positions he’s maintained throughout his career. By the same standard his political rivals are not part of it, due to the policy positions they have maintained throughout their careers. Nevertheless they demand equal attention from the Pope. They covet his public approval even as they refuse to cooperate with him.

    American politicians have generally been dismissive of Pope Francis’s advice, but they don’t seem to realize that when they act as if the Vatican’s invitation is a compliment to the Senator they reveal a grudging respect for him. This is the central irony of this ironic campaign. They don’t take Francis’s advice seriously but they want his approval for political reasons, or in this case they want to deny his approval to Sanders. It seems that for them the pope is merely one of the trappings of power—he’s the Pope-figure. He exists to acknowledge the eventual nominee, but the nominee’s policies are none of his business.

    This irony came into view when Donald Trump exploded in anger at the suggestion that building walls instead of bridges is not Christian. Trump could have changed this policy if he really wanted the Pope’s approval, so the fact that he didn’t change it is telling. Apparently his faith, like his plan to build a wall, is a political strategy. Therefore, to question his faith is to question his electability.

    Then Trump’s supporters in the media raised irony to a new level. When the Pope tried to clarify what he thought was a misunderstanding on Trump’s part, they declared a victory for Trump! They apparently thought this was a wrestling match. The problem is that when a religious leader appears with a warning, it is not the place of those being warned to declare the victor. That’s a decision for future generations.

    I’m not writing this article to convince people to vote for Senator Sanders. The majority of Americans are already voting for him. The problem is they are being cheated out of their vote. What I’m trying to do here is put this battle in its proper context.

    The candidate who appears poised to claim the presidency labors under a series of misunderstandings about reality. She has no capacity for appreciating this conversation. Her level of blindness and deafness is breathtaking. I call on this candidate to step down.

    Hillary Clinton, you are lacking in vision and imagination. I believe you have sold us out and then smilingly destroyed the evidence. Why else would you manage your server the way you have?  How dare you expect us to vote for you when you disrespect us like that? You and your minions have no solutions. You have only personal greed.

    Together we represent the way forward. You do not. We have a candidate who can lead us in the right direction but you are standing in our way. I call on you and your minions to step down.

    Pope Francis has not endorsed a candidate or offered an opinion about a candidate. This article represents my own opinion.

  • Missouri Democratic Party Helps Hillary

    On March 28, two weeks after the Missouri primary, the Missouri Democratic Party chose to reinterpret the rules for delegate allocation, potentially cementing Clinton’s victory in that state. By Friday evening, this change will be final.

    Clinton won the Missouri primary in a near tie. However under the old interpretation, because Sanders won in the counties with more voters, he would have won more delegates for the state. If the Party is successful in allowing the delegate count in each county to be allocated by the entire congressional district’s proportionality, then instead of Sanders earning 629 delegates to Clinton’s 601, he will only get 578 delegates to Clinton’s 652.

    Technically, this is not illegal.  Apparently, the Party’s handbook is written so that it can be interpreted either way. However, the timing of this change, and the fact that it reverses the outcome of the primary, puts it on the dirty trick list for the 2016 presidential primary.((Reddit: Sanders for President, April 7, 2016. Available:

    CRISIS IN MISSOURI (regarding delegate allocation)
    by inSandersForPresident


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8emL2T_Nss4))

    Thanks to Tim Black on YouTube for bringing this to my attention.

    ((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8emL2T_Nss4))

     

  • Sanders Wins Majority of Delegates at Nevada Democratic Convention

    The corporate media didn’t think the drama at Nevada’s convention was important. Nor did media bigwigs think it was important to report the fact that Bernie Sanders won more delegates at the convention than Clinton. For the details of the Nevada caucus see Tom Cahill’s article on U.S. Uncut. ((Tom Cahill, Bernie Sanders Wins the Nevada Caucus After All, U.S. Uncut, April 3, 2016. Available: http://usuncut.com/politics/bernie-wins-nevada-democratic-caucus/))

    Coincidentally, Trump also lost the delegate selection process, in Louisiana, in spite of the media’s fawning coverage of him. Apparently the media’s elites think we’re buying the story that Trump is a populist, like Bernie. Otherwise why would they keep saying it?  Of course that’s nonsense, Trump is an anti-populist. His candidacy has been compared to that of George Wallace, another man who used fear and racism to get his way. And who was Wallace running against? Civil rights advocate Hubert Humphrey. For a discussion of what he hoped to accomplish see the article on Wikipedia. ((George Wallace Presidential Campaign, 1968. Wikipedia. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace_presidential_campaign,_1968))

    Populists don’t turn people against each other by drumming up fear. That’s the plutocracy’s trick.  That’s how they keep us in line.  The media takes us all for fools.

  • Sanders Supporters Disenfranchised at Nevada Democratic Convention

    Ed Opperman’s YouTube channel, The Opperman Report, reported live on Saturday that Hillary Clinton’s supporters are railroading the Nevada Democratic convention.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xhuho4bGNh4&t=1227s

    Opperman reports that Michelle White, Hillary’s Nevada campaign manager, with the help of Marla Turner, Secretary of the Party’s Executive Board, tried Friday night to move someone on Clinton’s alternate list, who was not even there at the time, to the delegate list.  Michelle White had a whole different list of delegates than the one that had been agreed upon by the convention workers.

    Fortunately, the other members at the convention wouldn’t allow them to change the delegate count on Friday, and since White’s faction didn’t have a quorum, they couldn’t proceed.  However Saturday morning at 7 a.m. they removed Christine Kramar the chair of the credentials committee, accusing her of, what else?…giving Clinton information to the Sanders campaign! ((Jon Ralston, Bernie vs. Hillary Boils Over in Nevada Before Clark Convention, Ralston Reports, April 2, 2016. Available: https://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/bernie-vs-hillary-boils-over-nevada-clark-convention))

    Apparently SIEU had handed out letters Friday night telling Bernie’s supporters to return Saturday at noon, while they told Hillary’s supporters to be there at 7 a.m.   So Saturday morning those who objected to these tactics, and who were fortunate enough to be there in time, had to link arms with Christine to keep her from being physically removed.  Some Clinton supporters protested the tactics as well.  The bottom line is that Crystal Glass, Angie Sullivan, Melody Nelson and Christine L. Kramar were given trespass notices at the Nevada Democratic Convention.

  • Sanders’ Massachusetts Campaign Worker Alleges Infiltration by Clinton Operatives

    Since [intlink id=”2473″ type=”post”]Niko House’s[/intlink] report on North Carolina, reports continue to roll in of similar tactics in other states.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuEMOKSaTk0

  • Priorities USA Allegedly Paying Sanders’ Michigan Campaign Director

    Ryan Hughes, Bernie’s former Michigan Campaign Director, has been accused of taking money from Hillary’s Super PAC, Priorities USA, while working for Senator Sanders. This is illegal. Two additional state directors are being given a chance to come forward before their names are reported. In the meantime, these people are being positioned to work their magic in states like New York, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, and Rhode Island.

     

  • Not Enough Polling Places in Arizona, Long Lines

    In spite of warnings from Democrats, election officials decreased 200 polling places in 2012 to 60 in 2016.  ((Elvia Diaz, Arizona Election Officials Writing off Voters? You Bet. azcentral.com, March 23, 2016. Available: http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/elviadiaz/2016/03/22/maricopa-county-election-officials-writing-off-voters-you-bet/82145554/))

    People waited up to 5 hours.  ((Editorial Board, azcental.com, March 23, 2016. Available: http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/2016/03/23/arizona-primary-our-view-we-outraged-long-lines/82152636/))

    They were told they could go to any polling place in Maricopa County, but they all had lines.  ((E.J. Montini, Montini: Arizona–Where Registered Voters…CAN’T VOTE! azcentral.com, March 23, 2016. Available: http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2016/03/22/montini-primary-election-arizona/82149170))

  • Shady Business in North Carolina

    Did you ever wonder how Bernie could raise so much money from ordinary people and still lose the vote in some states?  Watch this video on Tim Black’s YouTube channel.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl-mHhH4qS0

  • Bernie Sanders and the Supreme Court

    It’s my theory that Merrick Garland will be confirmed to the Supreme Court. I think this is inevitable for the reason that everyone involved in this process has an interest in maintaining the Court’s conservative majority.  Then if the next president has to replace a liberal justice he or she will be able to be magnanimous and appoint another liberal since it won’t affect the conservative majority. But if the Court loses another conservative, a conservative will be appointed to replace him.

    Bernie Sanders is the only candidate who says he will ask President Obama to withdraw his nomination of Merrick Garland if he’s elected to the presidency. He’s the only candidate who has said he’ll nominate a justice who will overturn Citizens United.  He’s the only candidate who will be willing and able to change the majority on the Supreme Court.

  • In Case You Missed Bernie Sanders in Arizona

    See Senator Sanders’ speech on YouTube.  It made me feel better.  Maybe it will do the same for you.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZiRprH55yM

     

error: Content is protected !!